Exhaust gas treatment device

ABSTRACT

A device for treatment of exhaust gases includes a housing, a fragile structure resiliently mounted within the housing, and a non-intumescent mounting mat disposed in a gap between the housing and the fragile structure. The mounting mat includes a plurality of inorganic fibers that have undergone a surface treatment to increase the holding force performance of the mounting mat. Also disclosed are methods of making a mounting mat for an exhaust gas treatment device and for making an exhaust gas treatment device incorporating the mounting mat.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 11/170,502, filed Jun.29, 2005, which claims the benefit of the filing date under 35 U.S.C.§119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/583,800 filed onJun. 29, 2004, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference intheir entireties.

BACKGROUND

A device for the treatment of exhaust gases is provided, such as acatalytic converter or a diesel particulate trap having a fragilestructure mounted within a housing which is supported therein by amounting mat disposed between the housing and the fragile structure.

A catalytic converter assembly for treating exhaust gases of anautomotive or diesel engine contains a fragile structure, such as acatalyst support structure, for holding the catalyst that is used toeffect the oxidation of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and thereduction of oxides of nitrogen present in the exhaust gases. Thefragile catalyst support structure is mounted within a metal housing,and is preferably made of a frangible material, such as a monolithicstructure formed of metal or a brittle, fireproof ceramic material suchas aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide, magnesium oxide, zirconia,cordierite, silicon carbide and the like. These materials provide askeleton type of structure with a plurality of tiny flow channels.However, as noted hereinabove, these structures can be, and oftentimesare, very fragile. In fact, these monolithic structures can be sofragile that small shockloads or stresses are often sufficient to crackor crush them.

The fragile structure is contained within a metal housing, with a spaceor gap between the external surface of the fragile structure and theinternal surface of the housing. In order to protect the fragilestructure from thermal and mechanical shock and other stresses notedabove, as well as to provide thermal insulation and a gas seal, and tohold the fragile catalyst support structure in place within the housing,it is known to position at least one ply or layer of mounting or supportmaterial within the gap between the fragile structure and the housing.

Presently, materials used in mounting mats for catalytic converters andother exhaust gas-treating devices may range from relatively inexpensivematerials such as, for example, amorphous glass fibers such as S-glass,to more expensive materials such as, for example, highalumina-containing ceramic oxide fibers. Intumescent materials as wellas non-initumescent materials have been and continue to be employed inmounting mats, depending upon the application and conditions under whichthe mounting mats are to be used.

The type of monolithic structure to be employed as well as theapplication and the conditions under which the mounting mats are to beused must be determined prior to selection of the mounting matmaterials. For example, one would use a high temperature resistantmounting mat material adaptable over a wide temperature range for a hightemperature application such as typically found in catalytic converters,while a lower temperature resistant, resilient, flexible material may bejust as or more suitable for high G load applications that use heaviersubstrates such as may be found in diesel catalyst structures and dieselparticulate traps.

In any event, the mounting mat materials employed should be capable ofsatisfying any of a number of design or physical requirements set forthby the fragile structure manufacturers or the catalytic convertermanufacturers. For example, a state-of-the-art ply or plies of mountingmat material, should preferably exert an effective residual holdingpressure on the fragile structure, even when the catalytic converter hasundergone wide temperature fluctuations, which causes significantexpansion and contraction of the metal housing in relation to thefragile structure, also referred to as the catalyst support structure,which in turn causes significant compression and release cycles for themounting mats over a period of time. The best, state-of-the-art mountingmats used in high temperature applications have been found tosufficiently hold the fragile structure in the most severe ofapplications where temperatures reach well above 900° C., and oftenundergo constant thermal cycling to room temperature.

Other mounting mats, while not requiring use in high temperatureenvironments, must provide sufficient resiliency and flexibility toeffectively hold the fragile structure with sufficient force orstrength, but yet not crush the fragile structure under constant thermalcycling. Under normal operating conditions for a catalytic converter, aminimum shear strength for a mounting mat of at least 5 kPa to isrequired to prevent the fragile structure from being dislodged anddamaged. The shear strength of the mat is defined as the mat's holdingpressure multiplied by the coefficient of friction of the mat/fragilestructure interface. The coefficient of friction of typical mat productsin catalytic converters is approximately 0.45 in the in-use condition.Therefore, a mounting mat for high temperature applications, i.e., thoseapplications where the temperature in the catalytic converter mayincrease up to about 900° C. or more, should have an effective residualminimum holding pressure after 1000 cycles of testing at a hot facetemperature of about 900° C. of at least about 10 kPa.

For other exhaust gas-treating devices, such as diesel particulate trapsor diesel catalyst structures, it will be appreciated that while thesedevices do not reach the temperatures provided in high temperaturecatalytic converters, the weight of the fragile structure and loadingtechniques employed require the mounting mat utilized to have adifferent effective residual minimum holding pressure than that setforth above. In these applications, a higher minimum shear strength forthe mounting mat of at least about 25 kPa is preferably achieved toprevent that fragile structure from being dislodged and damaged. Thecoefficient of friction of these mat products in such high G-loadapplications with heavy substrates is still approximately 0.45 in thein-use condition. Therefore, a mounting mat for this type of applicationshould have an effective residual minimum holding pressure after 1000cycles of testing at a temperature of about 300° C. of at least about 50kPa.

Many mounting mats, heretofore, have attempted to overcome thermalcycling problems associated with high temperature applications by usinghigh alumina or mullite ceramic fibers. In one known embodiment, anaqueous solution or a colloidal dispersion, often called an “organosol”or a “sol gel” is used to produce the ceramic fibers. While ceramicfibers formed by sol gel processes may offer a high degree of resiliencyneeded for mounting monolithic structures, the high cost of the fibershave forced manufacturers to seek other, less expensive solutions. Inaddition, these ceramic fibers typically have an average fiber diameterof less than 5, and in some cases, less than 3.5, microns. Thus, thesefibers are respirable, i.e., capable of being breathed into the lungs.

In other instances, a fibrous mounting material may be used incombination with other materials, such as intumescent materials andbacking layers, in order to provide sufficient strength forhandleability, resiliency, or to obtain an adequate holding pressure.

As another alternative to using sol gel-derived, ceramic fibers,attempts have been made to form refractory ceramic fibers usingmelt-processing techniques. Only in the last ten years or so haverefractory ceramic fibers, i.e., fibers containing from about 45 to 60percent alumina and from about 40 to about 55 percent silica, satisfiedmanufacturers of high temperature catalytic converters by providingmounting mats having sufficient resiliency values to meet themanufacturers' demands. Not only are mounting mats containing suchrefractory ceramic fibers expensive, but also they are difficult tomanufacture, particularly with respect to the processing treatments theymust undergo. Care must be taken to ensure that they are substantiallyshot free.

In low temperature catalytic converter applications, such asturbocharged direct injection (TDI) diesel powered vehicles, the exhausttemperature is typically about 150° C. and may never exceed 300° C.Various types of mounting mats may be used for these and other slightlyhigher temperature applications. For many catalytic converterapplications, intumescent mats, i.e., mounting mats made fromintumescent materials such as graphite or vermiculite, have been used.It has more recently been observed that mounting mats made withintumescent materials may fail for these low temperature applications.

One possible reason for this failure is that the exhaust temperature maybe too low to expand the intumescent, typically vermiculite, particlessufficiently. Thus, the mats fail to provide sufficient pressure againstthe fragile structure and tend to fail. A second possible reason forthis failure is that organic binder systems used in the intumescent matproducts degrade and cause a loss in the holding pressure.

Thus, non-intumescent mounting mat systems have been developed and arenow common within the industry. These materials are suitable for useover a much wider temperature range than are the intumescent prior artmats.

Non-intumescent mat systems include substantially no intumescentmaterials such as graphite or vermiculite and, therefore, aresubstantially non-expanding. By “substantially non-expanding,” it ismeant that the mat does not readily expand upon the application of heatas would be expected with intumescent mats. Of course, some expansion ofthe mat does occur based upon its thermal coefficient of expansion, butthe amount of expansion is insubstantial and de minimus as compared tothe expansion of mats employing useful amounts of intumescent material.These non-intumescent mats, heretofore, have comprised high temperatureresistant, inorganic fibers and, optionally, a binder. By hightemperature resistant, it is meant that the fiber can have a usetemperature up to about 900° C. or greater. Depending upon theapplication, the temperature regime in which the mat is used, and thetype of monolith employed, non-intumescent mats have, heretofore, beenknown to generally contain one or more types of fibers selected fromalumina/silica fibers (available under the trademark FIBERFRAX fromUnifrax Corporation, Niagara Falls, N.Y.) and high alumina fiber matsavailable from Saffil.

Presently, fibers employed in state-of-the-art non-intumescent mountingmats for higher temperature applications are generally high in aluminacontent. For example, refractory ceramic fibers are composedsubstantially of alumina and silica and typically contain from about 45to about 60 percent by weight alumina and from about 40 to about 55percent by weight silica, while other alumina/silica ceramic fibers,such as alumina or mullite ceramic fibers made by sol gel processing,usually contain more than 50 percent alumina. S2-glass fibers typicallycontain from about 64 to about 66 percent silica, from about 24 to about25 percent alumina, and from about 9 to about 10 percent magnesia.Generally, it has been thought that the higher the amount of aluminaemployed in the fibers, the higher temperature for the application inwhich the fibers could be employed. The use of fibers consistingsubstantially of alumina have therefore been proposed for this purpose.

Other non-intumescent mounting mats are generally very thick and lackthe structural integrity needed for the exhaust gas treatment deviceapplication, and may even require being handled in a bag to preventcrumbling of the mounting mat. These mounting mats are also difficult tocut to size for installation, and further must be compressedsubstantially to fit enough material needed for supportive mountingwithin the gap between the catalyst support structure and the housing.

Attempts have been made to use still other types of materials in theproduction of non-intumescent mounting mats for catalytic converters andother exhaust gas-treating devices for high temperature applications,such as flexible, nonwoven mounting mats comprising shot-free ceramicoxide fibers comprising aluminosilicate fibers containing from about 60to about 85 percent by weight alumina and from about 40 to about 15percent by weight silica; crystalline quartz fibers: or both. Thesealuminosilicate fibers have a higher alumina content than refractoryceramic fibers, but are produced using the sol gel techniques discussedabove.

On the other hand, crystalline quartz fibers are made of essentiallypure silica (i.e., 99.9 percent silica). These fibers are made by a meltdrawing process using raw materials derived from crystalline quartz, andare not leached in any manner. Such fibers are available from J.P.Stevens, Slater, N.Y., under the tradename ASTROQUARTZ, or from SaintGobain, Louisville, Ky., under the tradename QUARTZEL. However, the costof these quartz fibers make them commercially prohibitive for use inmounting mats.

Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,290,522 discloses a nonwoven mounting mat fora catalytic converter that may contain magnesia/alumina/silicate fiberssuch as is known in the art and commercially available from OwensCorning, Toledo, Ohio as S2-GLASS, as well as the ASTROQUARTZ quartzfibers discussed in the above cited patent. In this patent, it isexpressly noted in Comparative Example 1 that a mounting mat containinga commercially available leached glass fiber containing silica did notpass the hot shake test used by the patentees to determine suitabilityas a mounting mat for higher temperature catalytic converters.

Mounting mats containing silica fibers in combination with intumescentmaterials have been tested for catalytic converter use, for example inGerman Patent Publication No. 19858025.

A detailed description and process for making leached glass fibers highin silica content is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 2,624,658, the entiredisclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Another processfor making leached glass fibers high in silica content is disclosed inEuropean Patent Application Publication No. 0973697. While both the U.S.patent and the European patent application publication disclose theproduction of leached silica fibers in the formation of high temperatureresistant products made from the resultant fibers, there is no mentionwhatsoever of the fibers being suitable for use or even being capable ofbeing used as mounting mats for exhaust gas treatment devices, such ascatalytic converters.

SUMMARY

Broadly, continuous inorganic fibers having undergone a surfacetreatment are used to form a substantially non-expanding mounting matsfor catalytic converters and other exhaust gas-treating devices. Incertain embodiments, melt-formed, leached glass fibers high in silicacontent having undergone a surface treatment are used to formnon-intumescent mounting mats for catalytic converters and other exhaustgas-treating devices.

In other certain embodiments, the leached and surface treated glassfibers containing silica or the mounting mats comprising them may beheat treated prior to being disposed within a catalytic converter tofurther increase the holding pressure performance of the mounting mats.

A device for treatment of exhaust gases is provided comprising ahousing; a fragile structure resiliently mounted within said housing;and a substantially non-expanding mounting mat disposed in a gap betweensaid housing and said fragile structure, wherein said mounting matincludes inorganic fibers having a holding pressure performanceincreasing surface treatment thereon.

According to certain embodiments, the device for treatment of exhaustgases comprises a housing, a fragile structure resiliently mountedwithin said housing, and a substantially non-expanding mounting matdisposed in a gap between said housing and said fragile structure,wherein said mounting mat includes melt-formed, leached glass fiberscontaining at least 67 percent by weight silica, and wherein at least aportion of the exterior surfaces of said leached glass fibers have theholding pressure performance increasing surface treatment thereon.

A method of making a device for treating exhaust gases is also provided,the method comprises providing a mounting mat comprising inorganicfibers having a holding pressure performance increasing surfacetreatment thereon, wrapping the mounting mat around at least a portionof a fragile structure adapted for treating exhaust gases, and disposingthe fragile structure and the mounting mat within a housing, whereby themounting mat holds the fragile structure resiliently within the housing.

According to other embodiments of the method of making a device fortreating exhaust gases, the method comprises providing a mounting matcomprising melt-formed glass fibers containing silica, wherein themelt-formed glass fibers are formed by treating the melt-funned glassfibers to have a silica content greater than the silica content of theglass fibers prior to being treated and whereby the treated glass fiberscontain at least 67 percent by weight silica, treating the exteriorsurfaces of at least a portion of said treated glass fibers, wrappingthe mounting mat around at least a portion of a fragile structureadapted for treating exhaust gases, and disposing the fragile structureand the mounting mat within a housing, whereby the mounting mat holdsthe fragile structure resiliently within the housing.

A method for making a mounting mat structure for holding a fragilestructure within the housing of an exhaust gas treatment device is alsoprovided, the method comprises providing inorganic fibers, applying aholding pressure-increasing surface treatment to at least portions ofthe exterior surfaces of the inorganic fibers, and incorporating thesurface treated inorganic fibers into a mat structure. The mounting matcontaining the surface treated inorganic fibers has a greater holdingpressure performance for holding a fragile structure within the housingof the exhaust gas treatment device as compared to a mounting matcontaining the same inorganic fibers, but without the holding pressureperformance increasing surface treatment.

According to other embodiments of the method for making a mat structurecontaining inorganic fibers, the method comprises applying a holdingpressure-increasing surface treatment to the exterior surfaces ofleached glass fibers containing at least 67 percent by weight silica,and incorporating the surface treated leached glass fibers into a matstructure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a fragmentary, elevational view of a catalytic convertercontaining a mounting mat according to the present invention.

FIGS. 2A-2D are photomicrographs showing inorganic fibers having asurface treatment applied on the exterior surfaces of the fibers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A device for treating exhaust gases is provided having a fragilestructure mounted within a housing that is supported therein by amounting mat disposed between the housing and the fragile structure. Itwill be understood that the mounting mat is not intended to be limitedto use in the catalytic converter shown in FIG. 1, and so the shape isshown only as an illustrative embodiment. In fact, the mounting matcould be used to mount or support any fragile structure suitable fortreating exhaust gases, such as a diesel catalyst structure, a dieselparticulate trap, or the like. Catalyst structures generally include oneor more porous tubular or honeycomb-like structures mounted by athermally resistant material within a housing. Each structure mayinclude anywhere from about 200 to about 900 or more channels or cellsper square inch, depending upon the type of exhaust treating device. Adiesel particulate trap differs from a catalyst structure in that eachchannel or cell within the particulate trap is closed at one end or theother. Particulate is collected from exhaust gases in the porousstructure until regenerated by a high temperature burnout process.Non-automotive applications for the mounting mat may include catalyticconverters for chemical industry emission (exhaust) stacks. The term“fragile structure” is intended to mean and include structures such asmetal or ceramic monoliths or the like which may be fragile or frangiblein nature, and would benefit from a mounting mat such as is describedherein.

One representative form of a device for treating exhaust gases is shownas a catalytic converter, generally designated by the numeral 10 inFIG. 1. Catalytic converter 10 may include a generally tubular housing12 formed of two pieces of metal, e.g. high temperature resistant steel,held together by flange 16. Alternatively, the housing may include apreformed canister into which a mounting mat-wrapped catalyst supportstructure is inserted. Housing 12 includes an inlet 14 at one end and anoutlet (not shown) at its opposite end. The inlet 14 and outlet aresuitably formed at their outer ends whereby they may be secured toconduits in the exhaust system of an internal combustion engine. Device10 contains a fragile catalyst support structure, such as a frangibleceramic monolith 18, which is supported and restrained within housing 12by a mounting mat 20, to be further described. Monolith 18 includes aplurality of gas pervious passages that extend axially from its inletend surface at one end to its outlet end surface at its opposite end.Monolith 18 may be constructed of any suitable refractory metal orceramic material in any known manner and configuration. Monoliths aretypically oval or round in cross-sectional configuration, but othershapes are possible.

The monolith is spaced from its housing by a distance or a gap, whichwill vary according to the type and design of the device utilized, e.g.,a catalytic converter, a diesel catalyst structure, or a dieselparticulate trap. This gap is filled with a mounting mat 20 to provideresilient support to the ceramic monolith 18. The resilient mounting mat20 provides both thermal insulation to the external environment andmechanical support to the catalyst support structure, protecting thefragile structure from mechanical shock, across a wide range of exhaustgas treatment device operating temperatures.

In general, the mounting mat includes continuous inorganic fibers havingundergone a surface treatment to increase the holding pressurecapability of the mounting mat 20 to resiliently hold a fragilestructure 18 within a housing 12 of an exhaust gas treatment device 10.Without limitation, a holding pressure performance increasing agent maybe applied to at least a portion of the exterior surfaces of theinorganic fibers to improve the holding pressure performance of themounting mat. Crystalline and polycrystalline inorganic fibers may beutilized in the mounting mats so long as the fibers can withstand thesurface treatment process, can withstand the high operating temperaturesof the exhaust gas treatment devices, and provide the minimum holdingpressure performance for holding fragile monoliths within the catalyticconverter housing. Without limitation, suitable inorganic fibers thatmay be used to prepare the mounting mat and exhaust gas treatment deviceinclude alumina fibers, alumino-silicate fibers, alumina/magnesia/silicafibers, calcia/magnesia/silica fibers, magnesia/silica fibers, S-glassfibers, E-glass fibers, quartz fibers, and silica fibers.

In certain embodiments, the mounting mat 20 comprises one or morenon-intumescent plies of melt-formed, amorphous, high-temperatureresistant leached glass fibers having a high silica content which haveundergone a surface treatment to increase the holding pressureperformance of the mat. The mounting mat 20 optionally includes a binderor other fibers suitable for acting as a binder. By the term “highsilica content,” it is meant that the fibers contain more silica thanany other compositional ingredient in the fibers. In fact, as discussedbelow, it will be appreciated that the silica content of these fibersafter leaching are preferably greater than any other glass fiberscontaining silica, including S-glass fibers, except crystalline quartzderived fibers or pure silica fibers.

The mounting mat, exhaust gas treatment device, and processes for makingthe same will be further described with reference to illustrativeembodiments utilizing leached glass fibers containing a high content ofsilica, and having a surface treatment applied to at least a portion ofthe exterior surfaces of the high silica containing glass fibers.

The mounting mat is generally an integral, substantially non-expandingcomposite sheet or sheets of melt-formed, leached glass fiberscontaining silica that have undergone a surface treatment and optionallyminor amounts of alumina and other non-siliceous oxides. By“melt-formed,” it is meant that the fibers are created using meltprocessing techniques and are not formed from sol gel or other chemicaldispersion techniques. By “integral,” it is meant that, aftermanufacture and densification, the mounting mat has a self-supportingstructure, needing no reinforcing or containment layers of fabric,plastic or paper, (including those which are stitch-bonded to the mat)and can be handled or manipulated without disintegration. By“substantially non-expanding,” it is meant that the mounting mat doesnot readily expand in response to the application of heat as would beexpected with mounting mat containing sufficient amounts of intumescentmaterials. It should be noted that some expansion of the mounting matsdoes occur in response to the application of heat, based upon thecoefficient of thermal expansion, but the amount of expansion isinsubstantial as compared to the expansion of mounting mats employingsufficient amounts intumescent materials. Hence, in certain embodiments,it will be appreciated that the mounting mat is devoid of intumescentmaterials, sol gel-derived glass silica fibers, and/or backing orreinforcing layers.

As noted above, the glass fibers are preferably treated to increase thesilica content of the fibers. That is, when first melt processed andformed into fibers such as by melt drawing the fibers, these glassfibers typically include many non-siliceous oxides and other components.That is, they may have the characteristics of fiberglass, for example.They are not initially formed from pure silica fibers like thecrystalline quartz derived fibers disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,290,522or 5,380,580. Instead, these “impure” glass fibers must be treated toremove the non-siliceous oxides such as sodium oxide, boron oxide, andany other water or acid soluble components present, thereby producingfibers of high silica content, wherein the silica content is greaterthan the silica content of the glass fibers prior to being treated. Thesilica content of a resultant treated glass fiber depends upon theamount of non-siliceous oxides and other components initially presentand the degree of extraction of these materials from the fibers.

Leaching is one preferred treatment for the glass fibers that willincrease the silica content of the fibers. Glass fibers may be leachedin any manner and using any techniques known in the art. Generally,leaching may be accomplished by subjecting the melt formed glass fibersto an acid solution or other solution suitable for extracting thenon-siliceous oxides and other components from the fibers. As previouslynoted, a more detailed description of various known leaching techniquesare discussed in U.S. Pat. No 2,624,658 and European Patent ApplicationPublication No. 0973697, although the leaching techniques that may beused are not limited to them.

The silica purity after leaching these glass fibers is much higher thanprior to leaching. Generally, the leached glass fibers will have asilica content of at least 67 percent by weight. This is greater thanthe silica content of S-glass. According to certain embodiments, theleached glass fibers contain at least 90 percent by weight. In fact, thesilica content of the leached glass fibers may be in the range of about90 percent by weight to about 99 percent by weight silica. It will beappreciated that the high silica content of these fibers is greater thanthe known purity of any other known glass fibers containing silica,including S-glass fibers, except quartz fibers or pure silica fiberswhich contain greater than 99.9 percent silica.

In certain embodiments, the glass fibers will contain from about 93 toabout 95 percent by weight silica, with the remainder of the fiber beingnon-siliceous oxides such as alumina, sodium oxide, and oxides of otheralkali or alkaline earth metals. Amounts of alumina may preferably rangefrom about 4 to about 6 percent by weight, while other ceramic oxidesand components, including sodium oxides, generally comprise less thanabout 1 percent by weight of the leached glass fiber. The leached glassfibers may contain less than 1 percent by weight alkali or alkalineearth metals. It will be understood that not all of the non-siliceousoxides need be removed from the leached glass fibers. The fibers arealso substantially shot free. The leached glass fibers high in silicacontent generally have 10 weight percent or less shot content. Incertain embodiments, the leached glass fibers high in silica contentgenerally have 5 weight percent or less shot content.

These leached glass fibers are relatively inexpensive as compared toceramic fibers such as high alumina fibers and particularly the abovedescribed crystalline quartz derived fibers. The average fiber diameterof these leached glass fibers may be greater than at least about 3.5microns, and in some instances, may be greater than at least about 5microns. On average, the glass fibers typically have a diameter of about9 microns. Suitable leached glass fibers generally may have an averagefiber diameter of from about 5 to about 14 microns. Thus, the leachedglass fibers used to make the mounting mat of the exhaust gas treatmentdevice are non-respirable.

The leached glass fibers may be provided in any form commonly used inthe production of mounting mats. In certain embodiments, these fibersare chopped tow fibers. Prior to leaching, it will be appreciated thatthe fibers can be produced by any method known in the art, but aretypically formed using known melt processing techniques such as eitherby melt spinning or melt drawing in a manner which will provide a costeffective approach to the production of the fibers. In certainembodiments, the glass fibers are melt drawn.

Examples of leached glass fibers high in silica content and suitable foruse in the production of a mounting mat for a catalytic converter orother known gas-treating device include those leached glass fibersavailable from BelChem Fiber Materials GmbH, Germany, under thetrademark BELCOTEX, from Hitco Carbon Composites, Inc. of GardenaCalif., under the registered trademark REFRASIL, and fromPolotsk-Steklovolokno, Republic of Belarus, under the designationPS-23(R).

The BELCOTEX fibers are standard type, staple fiber pre-yarns. Thesefibers have an average fineness of about 550 tex and are generally madefrom silicic acid modified by alumina. The BELCOTEX fibers are amorphousand generally contain about 94.5 silica, about 4.5 percent alumina, lessthan 0.5 percent sodium oxide, and less than 0.5 percent of othercomponents. These fibers have an average fiber diameter of about 9microns and a melting point in the range of 1500° to 1550° C. Thesefibers are heat resistant to temperatures of up to 1100° C., and aretypically shot free and binder free.

The REFRASIL fibers, like the BELCOTEX fibers, are amorphous leachedglass fibers high in silica content for providing thermal insulation forapplications in the 1000° to 1100° C. temperature range. These fibersare between about 6 and about 13 microns in diameter, and have a meltingpoint of about 1700° C. The fibers, after leaching, typically have asilica content of about 95 percent by weight. Alumina may be present inan amount of about 4 percent by weight with other components beingpresent in an amount of 1 percent or less.

The PS-23 (R) fibers from Polotsk-Steklovolokno are amorphous glassfibers high in silica content and are suitable for thermal insulationfor applications requiring resistance to at least about 1000° C. Thesefibers have a fiber length in the range of about 5 to about 20 mm and afiber diameter of about 9 microns. These fibers, like the REFRASILfibers, have a melting point of about 1700° C.

Leached glass fibers made into mat form have typically been found toprovide a mat having inadequate holding pressure. While it may bepossible for a mounting mat comprising leached glass fibers containingsilica to initially provide an adequate minimum holding pressure forholding a fragile structure within a housing of a catalytic converter,mechanical or thermal cycling of the mat will quickly destroy itsability to maintain that minimum holding pressure. Thus, one would beled away from using leached glass fibers high in silica content in theproduction of a catalytic converter mounting mat. This fact is confirmedby the failure of the hot shake testing reported in U.S. Pat. No.5,290,522.

The melt-formed, leached glass fibers high in silica content aresubjected to a surface treatment, which results in an increase in theholding pressure performance of a mounting mat containing a plurality ofthe leached, high silica containing glass fibers. Without being bound toany particular theory, it is believed that the surface treatment appliedto the leach glass fibers may result in an increase of the friction ofthe fiber surfaces. The increase in the friction of the exterior fibersurfaces substantially reduces the amount of slippage between the fibersof the mounting mat itself, between the fibers of the mounting mat andthe interior surfaces of the housing of the exhaust gas treatmentdevice, and between the fibers of the mounting mat and the exteriorsurfaces of the fragile structure that is in contact with the mountingmat.

According to one embodiment. the exterior surfaces of the leached glassfibers may be treated by applying an inorganic particulate material toat least portions of the fiber surfaces. Useful inorganic particulatematerials that may be utilized to treat the exterior of the fibersurfaces of the leached glass fibers include, without limitation,colloidal dispersions of alumina, silica, zirconia, and mixturesthereof. According to one embodiment, the inorganic material used totreat the exterior surfaces of the leached glass fibers, therebyincreasing the overall holding pressure performance of the mounting mat,is a colloidal dispersion of alumina.

At least a portion of the exterior surfaces of at least a portion of theleached glass fibers of the mounting mat include a a continuous ordiscontinuous coating of colloidal alumina. The colloidal alumina may beapplied to the exterior surfaces of the leached glass fibers by anysuitable means, without limitation, by coating, dipping, spraying,splashing, and the like. The colloidal alumina may be applied to theexterior surfaces of the leached glass fibers in either a continuous ordiscontinuous pattern. Moreover, the process of applying the colloidalalumina to the exterior surfaces of the leached glass fibers may becarried out during or after manufacture of the glass fibers.

The mounting mat structure for exhaust gas treatment devices including aplurality of the surface treated glass fibers having a surface treatmentof colloidal alumina, colloidal silica, and/or colloidal zirconia isbelieved to exert a greater frictional force against both the outersurfaces of the fragile monolith structure and the inner surface of thehousing of the exhaust gas treatment device. Thus, the mounting matincluding the surface treated glass fibers has a higher shear strengthfor resiliently holding fragile monoliths within the housing of theexhaust gas treatment device.

In certain embodiments, the leached and surface treated glass fibersprior to formation of the mounting mat, or mounting mats made from thesefibers after formation, may be heat treated to further improve theholding pressure performance of the mounting mats.

In one particular embodiment, these leached glass fibers (or themounting mats containing them) may be heat treated at temperaturesranging from above at least about 900° C. It has also been found thatheat treating the leached glass fibers high in silica content and havinga surface treatment of a colloidal dispersion of inorganic oxides, suchas a colloidal dispersion of alumina, at a temperature in the range fromabout 900° C. to about 1100° C. further improves the holding pressureperformance of a mounting mat such that the mounting mat employing thesefibers may exert the minimum required holding pressure within theexhaust gas treatment device, even after 1000 cycles of expansion andcontraction.

It is believed that heat treating the leached and surface treated highsilica glass fibers improves the creep resistance of the fibers. It isalso believed that heat treating the fibers removes additional aqueouscomponents out of the fibers. The use of heat treated and surfacetreated, leached, high silica glass fibers allows for the production ofa mounting mat that is suitable for higher temperature applications,well beyond the melting point of fiberglass.

Heat treatment of the leached glass fibers may take place prior toformation of the mounting mat or after formation of the mounting mat.When heat treated after formation of the mounting mat, the mounting matis heat treated at a temperature of at least about 900° C. for aneffective period of time to further improve the minimum holding pressureperformance of the mounting mat for holding the fragile structure withinthe housing for the application. Similarly, when heat treated prior toformation of the mounting mat, the leached and surface treated glassfibers may preferably be heated to a temperature of at least about 900°C. for an effective period of time such that, when formed into themounting mat, the minimum holding pressure performance for holding thefragile structure within the housing is further improved. The particularamount of time for heat treating may vary widely depending upon, amongother things, the thickness of the mat, the uniformity of the heating,type of heating source used, the ramp up time and temperature of theheating source, etc. All of these variables are well understood by thoseskilled in the art, so an effective period of time for heating at atemperature of at least about 900° C. or above may be readily determinedwithout undue experimentation.

Generally, it has been recognized that heat treatment may take anywherefrom 15 minutes or less, where relatively small, thin mats and excellentand uniform heat sources are used, to more than 1 hour where larger,thicker mats are employed (not including temperature ramp up and rampdown time). In certain embodiments, the mounting mat or leached glassfibers are heated at a temperature of between about 900° C. and about1100° C. for greater than 1 hour. Heat treating under any time andtemperature regimen below the time and/or temperature resulting indevitrification of the fibers, to achieve the same beneficial effectsoutlined above, would fall within the scope of the invention. Generally,the fibers or mat may be heat treated at or above the intended usetemperature. It is noted that heat treating at lower temperatures mayaffect the usefulness of the mounting mat in applications requiringthermal cycling at temperatures substantially above the heat treatmenttemperature.

According to certain embodiments, leached glass fibers high in silicacontent and having a surface treatment of colloidal alumina may be heattreated at a temperature from about 900° C. to about 1100° C. for about2 hours. The resulting mounting mats incorporating a plurality of suchfibers possesses the required minimum holding pressure for holding afragile monolith within the housing of the catalytic converter. As shownin FIGS. 2A-2D, heat treating the leached glass fibers high in silicacontent and having a surface treatment of colloidal alumina provides auniform coating (continuous or discontinuous) on the surfaces of thefibers. When viewed by electron microscopy, the surface addition ofcolloidal alumina is amorphous in nature and does not contain anycrystal formations, such as mullite crystals.

Other methods may be used to treat the leached and surface treated glassfibers for use in the mounting mat in order to further improve andmaintain a minimum holding pressure for holding the fragile structurewithin the housing for example, an ion exchange process or a diffusionprocess to increase the creep resistance of the fibers. However, it willbe understood that essentially any method by which one can treat theleached glass fibers or the mounting mat so as to further improve andmaintain a minimum holding pressure for the mat for holding the fragilestructure within the housing after thermal cycling, may be used.

The mounting mat preferably employs up to 100 percent by weight of theleached and surface treated glass fibers containing silica. However, inother embodiments, the mat may optionally comprise other known fiberssuch as alumina/silica fibers, or other ceramic or glass fibers suitablefor use in the production of mounting mats for the particulartemperature applications desired. Thus, alumina/silica fibers such asrefractory ceramic fibers may be optionally employed for hightemperature or wide ranging temperature applications. Other ceramic orglass fibers such as S-glass may be used with the leached glass silicafibers in similar or lower temperature applications. In such instances,however, the mounting mat preferably includes at least 50 percent byweight of leached and surface treated glass fibers containing silica. Inother words, the majority of the fiber utilized in the production of themat will be leached and surface treated glass fibers containing silica,and in certain embodiments, at least 80 percent by weight of the fiberswill be leached and surface treated glass fibers containing silica.

In certain alternative embodiments, fibers such as S2-glass and the likemay be added to the mounting mat in quantities of from greater than 0 toabout 50 percent by weight, based upon 100 percent by weight of thetotal mat. It is envisioned that these glass fibers will be used mainlyin low temperature applications due to their melting temperatures andthe like.

In other alternative embodiments, the mounting mat may includerefractory ceramic fibers in addition to the leached glass fibers. Whenrefractory ceramic fibers, that is, alumina/silica fibers or the likeare utilized, they may be present in an amount ranging from greater than0 to less than about 50 percent by weight, based upon 100 percent byweight of the total mat.

As noted previously, the mounting mats may or may not include a binder.When a binder is used, the components are mixed to form a mixture orslurry. The slurry of fibers and binder is then formed into a matstructure and the binder is removed, thereby providing a mounting matcontaining substantially only the heat-treated fibers (and optionallyadditional fibers). Typically, a sacrificial binder is employed toinitially bond the fibers together. The binders used are typicallyorganic binders. By “sacrificial,” it is meant that the binder willeventually be burned out of the mounting mat, leaving only the leachedglass fibers (and other ceramic or glass fibers, if used) as themounting mat for supporting the fragile structure.

Suitable binders include aqueous and nonaqueous binders, but preferablythe binder utilized is a reactive, thermally setting latex, which aftercure is a flexible material that can be burned out of an installedmounting mat as indicated above. Examples of suitable binders or resinsinclude, but are not limited to, aqueous based latexes of acrylics,styrene-butadiene, vinylpyridine, acrylonitrile, vinyl chloride,polyurethane and the like. Other resins include low temperature,flexible thermosetting resins such as unsaturated polyesters, epoxyresins and polyvinyl esters. Preferably, about 5 to about 10 percentlatex is employed, with about 8 percent being most preferred. Solventsfor the binders can include water, or a suitable organic solvent, suchas acetone, for the binder utilized. Solution strength of the binder inthe solvent (if used) can be determined by conventional methods based onthe binder loading desired and the workability of the binder system(viscosity, solids content, etc.).

Instead of binder, the mat may include other fibers in addition to theleached glass fibers to hold the mat together. Such fibers are known inthe art as binder fibers. These fibers may be used in amounts rangingfrom greater than 0 to about 20 percent by weight, based upon 100percent by weight of the total composition, to aid in binding theleached glass fibers together.

The mounting mat containing the leached and surface treated silicacontaining fibers can be prepared by any known techniques commonly usedin the preparation of mounting mats. For instance, using a papermakingprocess, the leached and surface treated glass fibers may be mixed witha binder or other fibers capable of acting as a binder to form a mixtureor slurry. Any mixing means may be used, but preferably, when a binderis used, the fibrous components are mixed at about a 0.25% to 5%consistency or solids content (0.25-5 parts solids to 99.75-95 partswater). The slurry may then be diluted with water to enhance formation,and it may finally be flocculated with a flocculating agent and drainageretention aid chemicals. Then, the flocculated mixture or slurry may beplaced onto a papermaking machine to be formed into a ply of fibercontaining paper. Alternatively, the plies may be formed by vacuumcasting the slurry. In either case, they are typically dried in ovens.For a more detailed description of the standard papermaking techniquesemployed, see U.S. Pat. No. 3,458,329, the disclosure of which isincorporated herein by reference. It will be appreciated that when abinder is employed and the leached and surface treated glass fibers areto be heat treated, the step of heat treating the fibers should beperformed prior to adding the binder or binding fibers to the leachedglass fibers.

In other embodiments, the leached and surface treated glass fibers maybe processed into a mat by conventional means such as dry air laying.The mat at this stage has very little structural integrity and is verythick relative to conventional catalytic converter and diesel trapmounting mats. The resultant mat can therefore be dry needled, as iscommonly known in the art, to densify the mat and increase its strength.Heat treatment of the fibers may occur prior to formation of the mat orafter the mat is needled.

Where the dry air layering technique is used, the mat may bealternatively processed by the addition of a binder to the mat byimpregnation to form a discontinuous fiber composite. In this technique,the binder is added after formation of the mat, rather than forming themat prepreg as noted hereinabove with respect to the conventionalpapermaking technique. This method of preparing the mat aids inmaintaining fiber length by reducing breakage. It will be appreciated,however, that heat treatment may occur prior to addition of any binder.

Methods of impregnation of the mat with the binder include completesubmersion of the mat in a liquid binder system, or alternativelyspraying the mat. In a continuous procedure, a fiber mat which can betransported in roll form, is unwound and moved, such as on a conveyer orscrim, past spray nozzles which apply the binder to the mat.Alternatively, the mat can be gravity-fed past the spray nozzles. Themat/binder prepreg is then passed between press rolls, which removeexcess liquid and densify the prepreg to approximately its desiredthickness. The densified prepreg may then be passed through an oven toremove any remaining solvent and if necessary to partially cure thebinder to form a composite. The drying and curing temperature isprimarily dependent upon the binder and solvent (if any) used. Thecomposite can then either be cut or rolled for storage ortransportation.

The mounting mat can also be made in a batch mode, by immersing asection of the mat in a liquid binder, removing the prepreg and pressingto remove excess liquid, thereafter drying to form the composite andstoring or cutting to size

It is noted that mounting mats produced from these leached and surfacetreated glass fibers may be too low in density for easy use in certaincatalytic converter applications. Therefore, they may undergo furtherdensification by any manner known in the art to provide a higherdensity. One such manner of densification is to needle punch the fibersso as to intertwine and entangle them. Additionally or alternatively,hydro-entangling methods nay be used. Another alternative is to pressthe fibers into a mat form by rolling them through press rollers. Any ofthese methods of densification of the mats or a combination of thesemethods can be readily used to obtain a mounting mat of the correct anddesired form.

Regardless of which of the above-described techniques are employed, thecomposite can be cut, such as by die stamping to form mounting mats ofexact shapes and sizes with reproducible tolerances. The mounting mat 20exhibits suitable handling properties upon densification as by needlingor the like, meaning it can be easily handled and is not so brittle asto crumble in one's hand like many other fiber blankets or mats. It canbe easily and flexibly fitted or wrapped around the catalyst supportstructure 18 or like fragile structure without cracking, and thendisposed within the catalytic converter housing 12. Generally, themounting mat-wrapped fragile structure can be inserted into a housing orthe housing can be built or otherwise fabricated around the mountingmat-wrapped fragile structure.

The mounting mat is capable of maintaining a minimum holding pressure ofat least 50 kPa after undergoing 1000 mechanical cycles of a standard1000 cycle gap expansion test conducted at a hot face temperature ofabout 300° C., with a mat gap bulk density of from about 0.3 to about0.5 g/cm³, and a percent gap expansion of about 2 percent. It will beappreciated that this test is particularly suited for mounting mats tobe used in holding heavier substrates in high G load applications in lowtemperature applications. Exhaust gas treatment devices for suchapplications include diesel catalyst structures and diesel particulatetraps. For high temperature applications, such as are common forcatalytic converters, the mounting mat has been found to be capable ofmaintaining a minimum holding pressure of at least 10 kPa afterundergoing 1000 mechanical cycles of a standard 1000 cycle gap expansiontest conducted at a hot face temperature of about 900° C., with a matgap bulk density of from about 0.3 to about 0.5 g/cm³, and a percent gapexpansion of about 5 percent.

By the term “cycle” it is meant that the gap between the monolith (i.e.,fragile structure) and housing is opened and closed over a specificdistance and at a predetermined rate. In order to simulate realisticconditions, the expansion of the gap between a housing and a fragilestructure of a given diameter may be determined by calculating thecoefficient of thermal expansion of a conventional housing at atemperature of, for example, about 900° C. A final mat basis weight isthen selected that will meet the criteria of the test, and provide aminimum holding force (Pmin) of greater than about 10 kPa after 1000cycles. The goal is to provide adequate support at the lowest cost, sothe minimum basis weight that satisfies the greater than about 10 kParequirement is selected. While certain prior art non-intumescentmounting mats may also have the capability of maintaining a “high”minimum pressure after 1000 cycles at a hot face temperature of at leastabout 900° C., those mats uniformly contain very expensive, sol gelderived ceramic fibers having a high alumina content of at least 30percent or higher, or crystalline quartz derived fibers, or both.

In operation, the catalytic converter experiences a significant changein temperature. Due to the differences in their thermal expansioncoefficients, the housing may expand more than the support structure 18,such that the gap between these elements will increase slightly. In atypical case, the gap may expand and contract on the order of about 0.25to about 0.5 mm during thermal cycling of the converter. The thicknessand mounting density of the mounting mat is selected such that a minimumholding pressure of at least about 10 kPa is maintained under allconditions to prevent the fragile structure from vibrating loose. Themounting pressure exerted by the mounting mat 20 under these conditionspermits accommodation of the thermal characteristics of the assemblywithout compromising the physical integrity of the constituent elements.

For mounting mats to be used in lower temperature applications, testingis conducted at about 300° C. However, the testing is conducted in thesame manner as the high temperature test described. However, given thedifferences in load applications and the fact that heavier catalyststructures are often used, the minimum holding pressure must be higher.Therefore, as noted above, the mat must provide a holding pressureagainst the fragile structure of at least 50 kPa after 1000 cycles oftesting at a hot face temperature of about 300° C.

EXPERIMENTAL

The following examples are set forth merely to further illustrate theeffect of the treatment of the exterior surfaces of inorganic fiberswith colloidal dispersions of inorganic oxide material. The illustrativeexamples should not be construed as limiting the mounting mat, exhaustgas treatment device incorporating the mounting mat, or the methods ofmaking the mounting mat or the exhaust gas treatment device in anymanner.

Four fiber mat samples were tested for the effect of the addition ofcolloidal alumina on the exterior surfaces of the silica fibers of themat on the holding pressure performance.

EXAMPLE C1

Example No. C1 was a fiber mat containing leached and heat treated glassfibers having a high silica content. The fiber mat was prepared by a wetforming process. Briefly, a slurry containing leached glass fibers highin silica content and which were heat treated at a temperature of about1100° C. for about 2 hours, binder, and water was prepared. The waterwas removed from the slurry thereby forming a mat structure. A 2 inch by2 inch sample was cut from the fiber mat. The fiber mat sample waspositioned between two heaters at a gap bulk density of 0.35. One heaterwas taken to a temperature of 900° C. to simulate operating temperaturesof a vehicle catalytic converter. As the temperature was elevated to900° C., the holding pressures of the fiber mat were recorded.

EXAMPLE C2

Example No. C2 was a fiber mat containing leached and heat treatedsilica fibers, and was prepared in accordance with Example C1. A 2 inchby 2 inch sample was cut from the fiber mat. The 2 inch by 2 inch fibermat sample was then placed between layers of an organic scrim material.The fiber mat sample having an organic scrim on each surface waspositioned between two heaters at a gap bulk density of 0.35. One heaterwas taken to a temperature of 900° C. to simulate operating temperaturesof a vehicle catalytic converter. As the temperature was elevated to900° C., the holding pressures of the fiber mat were recorded.

EXAMPLE 3

Example No. 3 was a fiber mat containing leached and heat treated silicafibers. A slurry containing the leached glass fibers, colloidal alumina,and water was prepared. The pH of the mixture was adjusted by theaddition of NaOH, which caused the colloidal alumina to precipitate ontothe surfaces of the leached glass fibers. The water was removed from theslurry thereby forming a loose mat structure. The mat structure was thendried. Following drying, the mat was heat treated at a temperature ofabout 1100° C. for about 2 hours. The heat treated loose fiber mat wasredispersed in a slurry with organic binder and water. The water wasremoved from the slurry, thereby forming a mat structure. The matstructure was then dried. The colloidal alumina was precipitated on theexterior surfaces of the fibers at 4 weight percent, based on the weightof the silica fiber mat.

A 2 inch by 2 inch sample was cut from the fiber mat and was then placedbetween layers of an organic scrim material. The fiber mat sample havingan organic scrim on each surface was positioned between two heaters at agap bulk density of 0.35. One heater was taken to a temperature of 900°C. to simulate operating temperatures of a vehicle catalytic converter.As the temperature was elevated to 900° C. the holding pressures of thefiber mat were recorded.

EXAMPLE 4

Example No. 4 was a fiber mat containing leached and heat treated silicafibers prepared in accordance with Example 3, except that the colloidalalumina was precipitated on the exterior surfaces of the fibers at 10weight percent, based on the weight of the silica fiber mat. A 2 inch by2 inch sample was cut from the fiber mat and was placed between layersof an organic scrim material. The fiber mat sample having an organicscrim on each surface was positioned between two heaters at a gap bulkdensity of 0.35. One heater was taken to a temperature of 900° C. tosimulate operating temperatures of a vehicle catalytic converter. As thetemperature was elevated to 900° C. the holding pressures of the fibermat were recorded.

The holding pressure data for the fiber mat is reported in Table Ibelow.

TABLE I Pressure (kPa) Temperature (° C.) C1 C2 3 4  65 265 300 362 379100 246 254 308 378 150 205 202 262 338 200 190 177 243 299 250 160 133206 281 300 111 101 178 246 350 94 91 169 216 400 88 84 161 202 450 8680 157 193 500 85 73 136 182 550 83 70 131 172 600 83 69 127 170 650 8268 124 168 700 85 69 125 168 750 87 70 126 168 800 88 70 128 169 850 8870 129 169 900 90 69 130 169 % Loss 66% 77% 64% 55%

Upon heating the silica fiber mat of Example No. C1 through atemperature range of 65° C. to 900° C., the holding pressure of the matdecreased from 265 kPa to 90 kPa. Thus, a silica fiber mat without atreatment of colloidal alumina exhibited a loss in holding pressure fora fragile monolith of about 66%.

Upon heating the silica fiber mat of Example No. C2 through atemperature range of 65° C. to 900° C., the holding pressure of the matdecreased from 300 kPa to 69 kPa. Thus, a silica fiber mat without analumina addition exhibited a loss in holding pressure for a fragilemonolith of about 77%. These results indicate that attaching an organicscrim layer to a surface of a silica fiber mat further increases theloss in holding pressure performance of the silica fiber mat, thusreducing the holding pressure performance of the mat.

Upon heating the silica fiber mat of Example No. 3 through a temperaturerange of 65° C. to 900° C., the holding pressure of the mat onlydecreased from 362 kPa to 130 kPa. Thus, a silica fiber mat with a 4%addition of colloidal alumina to the exterior surfaces of the silicafiber exhibits an improvement in holding pressure performance over asilica fiber mat without an addition of colloidal alumina.

Upon heating the silica fiber mat of Example No. 4 through a temperaturerange of 65° C. to 900° C., the holding pressure of the mat onlydecreased from 379 kPa to 170 kPa. Thus, a silica fiber mat with 10%alumina addition only exhibited a loss in holding pressure for a fragilemonolith of about 55%. This is a significant improvement in holdingpressure performance as compared to a silica fiber mat without anaddition of colloidal alumina.

EXAMPLE 5

A mounting mat for an exhaust gas treatment device was prepared fromleached glass fibers high in silica content by a wet forming process. Aslurry containing the leached glass fibers, binder, and water wasprepared. The water was removed from the slurry thereby forming a matstructure. The mat structure was then dried. Following drying, the matwas heat treated at a temperature of about 1100° C. for about 2 hours.The heat treated mat was wrapped around a portion of a fragile ceramicmonolith and the wrapped monolith was inserted into a steel housing,thereby forming a catalytic converter.

The catalytic converter was exposed to a temperature of about 700° C.for about 2 hours, followed by exposure to a temperature of about 500°C. for about 6.5 hours, followed by exposure to a temperature of about750° C. for about 6.5 hours. After exposure of the catalytic converterto the above conditions, the monolith was pushed out of the catalyticconverter housing by a mechanical ram. The force required to push themonolith out of the catalytic converter housing was 204N.

EXAMPLE 6

A mounting mat for an exhaust gas treatment device was prepared fromleached glass fibers high in silica content by a wet forming process. Aslurry containing the leached glass fibers, colloidal alumina, and waterwas prepared. The pH of the mixture was adjusted by the addition ofNaOH, which caused the colloidal alumina to precipitate onto thesurfaces of the leached glass fibers. The water was removed from theslurry, thereby forming a loose mat structure. The mat structure wasthen dried. Following drying, the mat was heat treated at a temperatureof about 1100° C. for about 2 hours. The heat treated loose mat wasredispersed in water and binder to form a slurry. The water was removedfrom the slurry thereby, forming a mat structure. The mat structure wasthen dried.

The mat was wrapped around a portion of a fragile ceramic monolith andthe wrapped monolith was inserted into a steel housing, thereby forminga catalytic converter. The catalytic converter was exposed to atemperature of about 700° C. for about 2 hours, followed by exposure toa temperature of about 500° C. for about 6.5 hours, followed by exposureto a temperature of about 750° C. for about 6.5 hours. After exposure ofthe catalytic converter to the above conditions, the monolith was pushedout of the catalytic converter housing by a mechanical ram. The forcerequired to push the monolith out of the catalytic converter housing was732N. Thus, the mounting mat of Example 6 provided an increased holdingpressure for holding the fragile monolith such that there was nearly a 4fold increase in the force required to push the monolith out of thehousing of the catalytic converter.

Thus, it has been demonstrated that treating the exterior surfaces ofleached glass fibers having a high silica content with a dispersion ofcolloidal inorganic oxides, such as a colloidal dispersion of alumina,results in a reduction in the loss of holding pressure performance of amounting mat over a wide range of operating temperatures experienced inexhaust gas treatment devices.

The mounting mats can be die cut and are operable as resilient supportsin a thin profile, providing ease of handling, and in a flexible form,so as to be able to provide a total wrap of the catalyst supportstructure, if desired, without cracking. Alternatively, the mounting matmay be integrally wrapped about the entire circumference or perimeter ofat least a portion of the catalyst support structure. The mounting matmay also be partially wrapped and include an end-seal as currently usedin some conventional converter devices, if desired, to prevent gasby-pass.

The mounting mats described above are also useful in a variety ofapplications such as conventional automotive catalytic converters for,among others, motorcycles and other small engine machines, andautomotive preconverters, as well as high temperature spacers, gaskets,and even future generation automotive underbody catalytic convertersystems. Generally, they can be used in any application requiring a mator gasket to exert holding pressure at room temperature and, moreimportantly, to provide the ability to maintain the holding pressure atelevated temperatures of from about 20° C. to at least about 1100° C.,including during thermal cycling.

The mounting mats described above can also be used in catalyticconverters employed in the chemical industry which are located withinexhaust or emission stacks, including those which contain fragilehoneycomb type structures that need to be protectively mounted.

The present invention is not limited to the specific embodimentsdescribed above, but includes variations, modifications and equivalentembodiments defined by the following claims. The embodiments describedabove are not necessarily in the alternative, as various embodiments maybe combined to provide the desired characteristics.

1. A device for treatment of exhaust gases comprising: a housing; afragile structure resiliently mounted within said housing; and asubstantially non-expanding flexible mounting mat disposed in a gapbetween said housing and said fragile structure, wherein said mountingmat includes heat treated inorganic fibers having a holding pressureperformance-increasing surface treatment thereon comprising an inorganicparticulate material on at least a portion of the exterior surfaces ofat least a portion of the inorganic fibers; and wherein the mounting mathas a minimum holding pressure for holding the fragile structure withinthe housing of one of (i) at least 50 kPa after 1000 cycles of testingat a hot face temperature of 300° C., a gap bulk density of between 0.3and 0.5 g/cm³, and a percent gap expansion of 2 percent, and (ii) atleast 10 kPa after 1000 cycles of testing at a hot face temperature of900° C., a gap bulk density of between 0.3 and 0.5 g/cm³, and a percentgap expansion of 5 percent.
 2. The device of claim 1, wherein saidfibers are selected from alumina, alumino-silicate fibers,alumina/magnesia/silica fibers, calcia/magnesia/silica fibers,magnesia/silica fibers, S-glass fibers, E-glass fibers, quartz fibers,and silica fibers.
 3. The device of claim 2, wherein said mounting matcomprises at least one integral, substantially non-expanding layer ofmelt-formed, leached glass fibers containing at least 67 percent byweight silica.
 4. The device of claim 3, wherein said leached glassfibers contain at least about 90 percent by weight silica.
 5. The deviceof claim 4, wherein said leached glass fibers contain from about 90 toabout 99 percent by weight silica.
 6. The device of claim 5, whereinsaid leached glass fibers contain from about 93 to about 95 percent byweight silica and from about 4 to about 6 percent by weight alumina. 7.The device of claim 3, wherein said leached glass fibers contain lessthan about 1 percent by weight alkali metal or alkaline earth metal. 8.The device of claim 3, wherein said mounting mat comprises from about 50to 100 percent by weight of said leached glass fibers.
 9. The device ofclaim 8, wherein said mounting mat comprises at least about 80 percentby weight of said leached glass fibers.
 10. The device of claim 3,wherein the mounting mat is substantially free of binder.
 11. The deviceof claim 3, wherein the leached glass fibers have a diameter greaterthan about 3.5 microns.
 12. The device of claim 3, wherein the leachedglass fibers are substantially shot free.
 13. The device of claim 3,wherein the mounting mat contains greater than 0 to about 50 weightpercent, based upon 100 percent by weight of the total mat, of S2-glassfibers or refractory ceramic fibers.
 14. The device of claim 1, whereinsaid holding pressure performance-increasing surface treatment comprisesa coating.
 15. The device of claim 14, wherein said coating is one of acontinuous or discontinuous coating.
 16. The device of claim 1, whereinsaid inorganic particulate material is selected from the groupconsisting of dispersions of colloidal alumina, colloidal silica,colloidal zirconia, or mixtures thereof.
 17. The device of claim 16,wherein said inorganic particulate comprises a friction increasingagent.
 18. The device of claim 1, wherein the mounting mat is heattreated at a temperature of at least about 900° C.
 19. The device ofclaim 1, wherein the device is a catalytic converter or dieselparticulate trap.
 20. A flexible mounting mat comprising: heat treatedinorganic fibers; and a holding pressure performance increasing surfacetreatment comprising an inorganic particulate on at least a portion ofthe exterior surfaces of at least a portion of the inorganic fibers;wherein said flexible mounting mat has a minimum holding pressure forholding the fragile structure within the housing of one of (i) at least50 kPa after 1000 cycles of testing at a hot face temperature of 300°C., a gap bulk density of between 0.3 and 0.5 g/cm³, and a percent gapexpansion of 2 percent, and (ii) at least 10 kPa after 1000 cycles oftesting at a hot face temperature of 900° C., a gap bulk density ofbetween 0.3 and 0.5 g/cm³, and a percent gap expansion of 5 percent. 21.The mounting mat of claim 20, wherein said fibers are selected fromalumina, alumino-silicate fibers, alumina/magnesia/silica fibers,calcia/magnesia/silica fibers, magnesia/silica fibers, S-glass fibers,E-glass fibers, quartz fibers, and silica fibers.
 22. The mounting matof claim 21, wherein said mounting mat comprises at least one integral,substantially non-expanding layer of melt-formed, leached glass fiberscontaining at least 67 percent by weight silica.
 23. The mounting mat ofclaim 22, wherein said mounting mat comprises from about 50 to 100percent by weight of said leached glass fibers.
 24. The mounting mat ofclaim 23, wherein said mounting mat comprises at least about 80 percentby weight of said leached glass fibers.
 25. The mounting mat of claim22, wherein the mounting mat is substantially free of binder.
 26. Themounting mat of claim 22, wherein the leached glass fibers have adiameter greater than about 3.5 microns.
 27. The mounting mat of claim22, wherein said holding pressure performance-increasing surfacetreatment comprises a coating.
 28. The mounting mat of claim 20, whereinsaid inorganic particulate is selected from the group consisting ofdispersions of colloidal alumina, colloidal silica, colloidal zirconia,or mixtures thereof.
 29. The mounting mat of claim 28, wherein saidinorganic particulate comprises a friction increasing agent.